Institutions Under Pressure
An Interactive Analysis of Administration Actions in 2025
Executive Summary
The administration in 2025 is pursuing a comprehensive, ideologically driven agenda to reshape higher education and non-profit sectors. This involves direct financial cuts, regulatory changes, legal challenges, and rhetorical attacks, often stemming from the Project 2025 blueprint. The strategy leverages federal power to enforce conformity, facing robust legal challenges from affected institutions. This interactive report allows you to explore the data behind this trend.
Universities Targeted
Non-Profit Categories Targeted
In Research Grants Canceled at Harvard
Primary Methods of Attack
This chart aggregates the primary tactics used against the institutions listed in this report. Many institutions face multiple types of pressure simultaneously. "DEI Investigation" is the most common single action, followed by threats to funding and tax-exempt status.
Universities Under Scrutiny
This section details the specific universities targeted by administration policies. Actions range from investigations into Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs to significant cuts in federal funding and threats against tax-exempt status. Use the filters and search bar below to explore the data. Click on an institution's card for more details and a link to their fundraising site, where available.
Non-Profits Under Pressure
Similar to universities, non-profits are facing significant regulatory and financial challenges. The administration is targeting organizations involved in environmental advocacy, immigration support, public media, and more. Key tactics include federal funding cuts, freezes, and threats to their tax-exempt status. Use the tools below to filter the list of affected organizations and categories.
Cross-Cutting Themes & Strategic Analysis
The administration's actions are not random; they follow a consistent pattern driven by a clear ideological agenda. The primary goal is to compel alignment with its views on issues like DEI, immigration, and curriculum. This is achieved by weaponizing the financial and regulatory powers of the federal government. The diagram below illustrates the strategic flow from ideology to impact.
Primary Levers of Power
Targeted Sectors
Intended Impacts
This strategic approach has led to numerous lawsuits and widespread concern over due process. The judiciary has, in some cases, acted as a check on executive power, but the ongoing pressure creates significant financial strain and legal uncertainty for the targeted institutions, forcing them to divert resources from their core missions to legal defense and compliance.
Comments
Post a Comment
New comments on this blog are moderated. If you do not have a Google identity, you are welcome to post anonymously. Your comments will appear here after they have been reviewed. Comments with vulgarity will be rejected.