"COLORFUL LEADERSHIP"

MAGA caters to vulgarity in its leadership.

From Gemini AI:

References cited by Gemini:

Much of this is meek and mild compared to the public conduct of some others in the Trump regime.

Trump, by far, leads this pack of coyotes in his plethora of bad examples of public demeanor.

Trump’s use of vulgar gestures & language is eclipsed, however, by his deliberate demonization of a variety of people. Here are some notable instances & their consequences.

[6]

Policy Outcomes of Epithet Rhetoric

GROK found these dehumanizing volleys fired off by Trump in 2025 & 2026:

References:

Q: So what?

A: The consequences of this sort of deliberately hateful conduct are well known. GROK summarizes:

Trump's use of dehumanizing language in these posts, such as equating groups to "garbage," "vermin," or "animals," strips away their humanity and portrays them as threats or inferior beings. This rhetoric often targets immigrants, political opponents, and minorities he views as enemies.
The consequences of this conduct are multifaceted and well-documented. It

increases stigmatization, leading to
heightened stress among targeted groups, which exacerbates physical and mental health issues like heart disease, anxiety, and depression,
while making individuals less likely to seek healthcare. Such language
polarizes public attitudes,
emboldening supporters to express more overt racism and dehumanization, resulting in
surges in hate crimes against Black people and other minorities following events like Trump's election victories. It
normalizes prejudice, leading to
increased bullying in schools and discriminatory behaviors. On a societal level, it
justifies aggressive policies like mass deportations and family separations,
inflicting psychological and physical harm, and
contributing to institutionalized violence. Critics argue it
echoes authoritarian tactics, potentially
escalating to broader social divisions and even violence, as
dehumanization historically precedes hate crimes or worse. However, some sources suggest
it also galvanizes opposition, with Trump's critics becoming less likely to endorse dehumanizing views, creating a countervailing force against normalization.
[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

Vermin like convicted vicious criminal Trump, an animal with bad genes, set the tone for MAGA.

And this has happened before:

From GROK:

GROK lists references for the above table as follows:

Trump's dehumanizing rhetoric, such as labeling immigrants as "animals," "vermin," or "garbage," echoes the Confederate era's portrayal of enslaved people as "brutes," "savages," or inherently inferior beings unfit for equality.

Both sets of language
reduce targeted groups to subhuman status,
framing them as threats to societal order—immigrants as criminal invaders in Trump's narrative, similar to enslaved people as potential rebels or burdens in Confederate views.

Likewise, Trump's depiction of political opponents or certain immigrant groups as "poison" or existential dangers parallels Confederate propaganda against Yankees as "aggressors," "hordes," or "vandals" intent on destroying Southern society.

This comparison highlights a shared strategy: using inflammatory terms to justify exclusion, violence, or harsh policies, whether mass deportations today or enslavement and war in the 19th century.

Historically, such language

facilitated atrocities like
lynchings and
the perpetuation of slavery, while today it correlates with
rises in hate crimes and
social division, as dehumanization
lowers barriers to harm and
polarizes communities.

The leadership of this country must be changed and the current regime turned out to preserve the Union. Expel the Confederates from the federal government! They snuck in there while we weren’t looking, but we will watch them go!