Skip to main content

Here is the final draft of the chart Social Networking Platforms 2018.


Here is the final draft of the chart Social Networking Platforms 2018. As before, see the community spreadsheet for details of particular platforms.

Note the interesting reorganization of the chart, plus a few additions and corrections. Many thanks for the insightful and helpful comments. Yay community!

Intent of the chart is to provide a researched list of current viable platforms within a simple architectural framework. Three factors:

(1) Closed/open standards and centralization/decentralization (which tend to go together).

(2) Organized by the pacing and effort typical of user interaction within the communities on the platform. One special group singled out for use of tokens, rewards, tips to form an economic social climate.

(3) Major/minor user base - shown by bold/light text, admittedly my quick swag at it, may need corrections.

If this version is reasonably stable, I'll put future updates on a website to avoid cluttering up our stream here with minor changes.

[Edit: Note a correction to be updated later - Medium and Steemit are miscategorized re proprietary/open standards.]

Many thanks to contributors.

Comments

  1. Because of my use of FB I would slot it between Twitter and blogs (but I realise I am struggling with your label General Social)
    I follow local citizen science groups there, which are not accessible elsewhere. Both the posts and the informed conversation that follow are useful to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You can be commercial, decentralised and open source at the same time. Here the GitHub link to Steemit it prove it:

    github.com - steemit

    I wonder how your sort that one out 😉

    ReplyDelete
  3. Filip H.F. Slagter i'll check into the blog items, particularly activityPub support, thanks. Pleroma and gnu social were on my list but didn't seem to be established enough for the main list. What's your take on them coming into the mainstream? Do you have any links to recent briefs on their viability?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Martin Krischik i'll check that later today, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Diana Studer Can you say more why the general social label doesn't sit right with you? thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, GNU Social predates Mastodon. It might not be as popular as Mastodon (though I have no figures to back that), I would say that its history with the Federation would make it a name worthy of mentioning, even though it's not one I would pick myself, especially since I don't like the aesthetic and prefer Mastodon's feature set.

    Pleroma also has quite a lot of instances (http://distsn.org/pleroma-instances.html), each with their own different kind of audience/community and sometimes also different settings/features. Especially the low resource requirements might make it an interesting alternative to Mastodon for those who want to self-host. For that reason alone I might consider that over Mastodon to integrate my own site with federated support. And if you like Mastodon's interface better, they even support that.
    distsn.org - Pleroma Instances

    ReplyDelete
  7. Diana Studer Oh, btw, general social networks like fb and g+ often provide a broad gamut of services extending and overlapping more specialized platforms both directions, rapid to deliberate. chat to publishing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Filip H.F. Slagter There are only two reasons to mention a social media network in this community:

    ⑴ It's a worthy alternative for Google+
    ⑵ It's not worthy alternative for Google+

    The 2nd option so people won't waste there time on trying it out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bill Brayman yes - it is my personal interpretation, not a directed criticism.
    Similar to many people sternly saying G+ is for, about, and thanks to, photographers. Discarding text as so much padded dross.

    Whichever of your boxes we choose, whether the content is fluff or profound depends on what we choose (or not) to bring to our stream.

    I see it as Social plus Local News e.g.keeping up with wildfires in California or my own Western Cape.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Diana Studer Oh i agree the sometimes carrying on about the photo community that was great, but overlooks the much bigger view of the conversations and other dimensions of g+. And yes, much of my g+ experience too was the good curation of news and interesting tidbits everyday, day in and day out.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Martin Krischik whether a network is a worthy alternative or not depends per person.
    Nowhere in the infographic did I see mentioned that it was only a list of (non-) alternatives to Google+ only...; it merely looked like an attempt to (re-)categorise them.
    I'm not gonna decide what platform is or isn't a viable alternative to others; there's plenty of others in this community already who try to push one or the other platform down your throat without giving others a second thought.

    I saw some alternatives, viable or not, missing from the categorisation list, so I mentioned them as they, imho, are significantly different enough from the already listed ones. If those suggestions aren't welcome, then I'll just mute out of this discussion.

    Though perhaps Bill Brayman finds this list of federated alternatives to proprietary platforms interesting: https://mastodon.at/@switchingsocial/100820109103853713
    mastodon.at - switching.social (@switchingsocial@mastodon.at)

    ReplyDelete
  12. NB: Martin Krischik does not speak for the G+MM community or its mods.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks to Teodora Petkova I have this

    3. Expose your mental models to the open air.
    Remember, always, that everything you know, and everything everyone knows, is only a model. Get your model out there where it can be shot at. Invite others to challenge your assumptions and add their own. Instead of becoming a champion for one possible explanation or hypothesis or model, collect as many as possible. Consider all of them plausible until you find some evidence that causes you to rule one out. That way you will be emotionally able to see the evidence that rules out an assumption with which you might have confused your own identity

    from donellameadows.org - Dancing With Systems

    I don't want a worthy or not list. I want the discussion so I can decide for myself where to go. Or if I go somewhere new. Or if I lean towards digital detox.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Filip H.F. Slagter That switching social link looks very helpful. I'll chase down the various leads coming out of it.

    Regarding the worthiness criteria, For the general purpose chart of alternatives, it's important to remain as agnostic as possible. Especially since the whole landscape is in fast evolution right now. But I do want to promote the so called indie web stuff because that's where open standards are going emerge from and that's the key driver for the future, imho. So, i think we're in agreement in principle.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Diana Studer Oh that dancing with systems looks like really good reading in general.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wait.... Medium is decentralized/open? Are you sure?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bill Brayman Donella Meadows was an underappreciated genius.

    ReplyDelete
  18. John Douglas Porter Er um, it was a last minute addition, and probably needs to be corrected.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I can already see several corrections and enhancements to the chart of alternatives. Better treatment of early adapter and startup platforms. Way to add and organize various adjunct services, like groups.io and other group services, and even other types of services such as identity management. For example Diaspora adds on 3rd party chat services and the platform has limited groups capability and will need to add that functionality. That mix and match modular approach may become the norm as protocols and semantic data structures become standardized. Just thinking...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Edward Morbius ... Teodora Petkova has begun a Ph D. Thanks to G+ my filter bubble has exploded around her fresh focus.
    Where will I find a 'replacement' for G+ which will give me that openness to interesting (and approachable engaging) people?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Diana Studer Web search and, increasingly, bibliographies, are my guide. Sci-Hub and Lib-Gen are amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Diana Studer I like that: "openness to interesting (and approachable engaging) people" - now me and Gideon Rosenblatt and Luc Jallois might want to try to translate that into features and maybe Solid app :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

New comments on this blog are moderated. If you do not have a Google identity, you are welcome to post anonymously. Your comments will appear here after they have been reviewed. Comments with vulgarity will be rejected.

”go"