I thought what is the best for G+ users. But I couldn't find it. MeWe has to open user profiles. But they will not open it. Minds has to make filters for communities. But they will not make it. It's simple but they will not do it cause it's their DNA.
Tumblr also has to support automatic submit for communities. This is a good chance to social media companies. But I think they are missing it.
So, I can't suggest the answer to G+ users. G+ point is community. But I can't know where will they go to.
If someone has got the answer, he has to suggest the best place for G+ communities. And has to ask to social media companies.
I guess MeWe and Facebook is the best for G+ community owners. And people will follow it. But they are not enough.
So, I guess G+ users have to be a multiple social media user. I guess some private profiles will go to Minds and tumblr. But communities will go to Facebook and MeWe. Anyway, community is the problem.
Tumblr also has to support automatic submit for communities. This is a good chance to social media companies. But I think they are missing it.
So, I can't suggest the answer to G+ users. G+ point is community. But I can't know where will they go to.
If someone has got the answer, he has to suggest the best place for G+ communities. And has to ask to social media companies.
I guess MeWe and Facebook is the best for G+ community owners. And people will follow it. But they are not enough.
So, I guess G+ users have to be a multiple social media user. I guess some private profiles will go to Minds and tumblr. But communities will go to Facebook and MeWe. Anyway, community is the problem.
Hubzilla has communities and collections, but it takes time to get used to the interface of it.
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/17SmpHrqkyI9BzUV0wciFw5ilPMnBkVfXwxx2FKaZF8P1XlvAv3pJKLU0nkqUPGu4YRK_AXJL8LFw8UYnM9wTjreu5zjuj5kkhKW=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/yGL4dYWPq4plOJe2hWlAfAAdkc71WVxQQRK7OfB0GGv_yO2Vn5QbcH-2JWPEtSkkF7s-V8P_XFce2XGVtipCVRe2xOUCJHv7HAJM=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/wDAVVoajiVFON5aPyFle1ayl9Qxy-rSGLPiupqAQvScZ9HE-uDK9LSMydQ0I3Toca9NKW1akrkswkeVnmeN5O5RfHPOuiLjeqb7q=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/KYXDWT1mv_Y3RKa1ehriRkxisEon2o4I1460YbaZDr1Dg2Bj8FMWEw6sO42OrOjU9kh7aeJJbsAqL2_3R220AYCDjXFt5wXZemPY=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/RFKoRXamhkRuCA8M-qld1iqpYwhMvUnuK6tkYfg9WzRrFAl183Xx_f5csJzUTdUtOEE3SpfTuwBwbTKhvHXM-nxKRfE_e2BlzdM0=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/MP6T6EKS95rYWasSUzmOl2-6oGBM7RaddVRt1XMSQ28gK2WMjGwUIrVq8yPqjIPbPzomgNMbxbcl4bzIr1igdO1g4CuA96ZMYQL7=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/CYKmm-2eulUI468q4DYMWvAtRKyIi5tvCZdOKsem59fuL7Hl1N3ivFmiHPKLZ_f76n1gzG4NXPO1JxzGq4uuYQLC5_UNCNzSzRPx=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/CTNAevJd34vcBSv4Zz5Kbcvg-Ff0fykAKgq0Qn6hyVKvNbMCede7enfHQLdH8VxdZ4Y7c0YOanoB0x2dird6a05E_Zc29ZmMLcD0=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/H4MQFkMwoUmb1HwRE6WXcOha1kYicoDOH2zR0tITFAWI71EFoTrg2JnVmHJa9oMnCZm3r6C46Z09QxHiDdRhRiY3VSzM6Dcy73XJ=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/N16Pe1xxolJTl1--v4WiaVGdrX5ILjtK8CMcT4gqCMWp4A5atJMh8V7pqNCpc_Tt5ykAWDkfeBGY2LiXWB99RTKSrh9oBLvBrES7=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9QfCjqks2vA-ck4GfCWPFvq3x3h2eh_6TKyirfVvAThrsz0IfkNS4ay13t6BANGexAmgAzjW5rbA5Dw7sQtkGm-THQyvY__Bn68I=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Q2Hll7ZUlDH3wCTjQvn2GfjE8-xwbbbvD3k7UYATIOz_HDIT2PupeQiS-7xwPgkiAl3E4SXtcml6GQx6W3FZF3rTiVN40nqFs3pf=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/riykeaRiSaM8xexjK1HhBU1hxUT_ddP-7YFk5HOG6bSOxbF-DLz3IQGkfoAbkLtOtzsJbjQ0d_aVujea5UzRKSOvH9TTbvib1mdT=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/kY-K_GID7uJVvtjEmLgurkJMTkg_dqAg7BquZhjv3koEu8zI82mvUeQGqubAb7pVEKdv8JgBOvx7Rugq-UUMaVHEtRWNjETlnfoo=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/oC00wez-qvJA3GOZoRc9OXL9NvGQBo4gOQWaKhM4Dmb4nr9aygRtR34k1a5l3Xg4pKYMvIG7sqiOBfNNNSpLwbjImewJyHNJGVXt=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/X6KP7qA7tj_FkomBCfu9K1OP0vXP7IlXyF115CWyjBi1HTCq1OV0VQQJ1pwMxzvb4cuE8H_ajO1ITm-O0axXZFonZPkhCTfLZsNS=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/VgHQhw5-LQp3RuAjHmZ-lDGG9H9mLNYRzmA6s-3NewgPjRlQo7wxSnB6nrTbMctOE-3mR2M_1ktH3MirxvqNpqQL_PsTl_qN9rhq=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/TLaWxH9eprrWMkK1LXu6JDcRFC8a_DzcwZj5lIwDsAGpMiLK75d-mUUoCxVTcNo9qZnWO-VFOr5tTc2HQicKkGBEFq63RHGkPSfL=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5BdubUQ1qlbUXodlChlX_NInCzwN1I-FlEfKWV9JGeTCl7oQLKid21hw72CoQTWatHWHAqyOE1ikeiL64HSeoOHcXR4GNr59_hBA=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/wtsj0r_JIEX0CYoLeV8wVNyz7rxOhtRJKShoo6y_oHdzgIcFgLubV4f8SremnUlIS9Qis-GS9AfONCKsZnCVmsgfpZ7SDDDvCGil=s0
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/HCYkfUbaTRCcuMTPEUOnasdTdkO14q0qvPYfAQjamcAW6nozSuCJme98Unc_oac5Q5BCw0MLGOblGxtRsjI-Q7XoghIyWJ9bJkjs=s0
ReplyDeleteAnton A Hubzilla (Goggleplus at least) lacks the communities that I desire.
ReplyDeleteFür alle die an Foto & Kunst aller Art interessiert sind ist Flickr eine gute Alternative zu G+.
ReplyDeleteEs wird sicher kein genau vergleichbares zu G+ geben.
Aber Flickr ist sehr ähnlich wie G+!
Man kann ein paar Kreise einrichten, beqeum "Alben" [Sammlungen] und "Gruppen" [Community's] erstellen. Link in die Bildbeschreibung geben, Tag [wie "#"], Favorisieren ["+"], und überall Kommentieren!!
Ich bin für Foto & Kunst inzwischen sehr zufrieden mit meinem kostenlosen [freier Platz für maximal 1.000 hochauflösende Fotos/Videos] Flickr Konto!!! ;))
Beste Grüße :-)
https://pluspora.com/ with some drawbacks of course
ReplyDeleteAndi Droid Perhaps Flickr is suitable for photography enthusiasts; however, not everyone is a photography enthusiast. I need a site that allows communities for discussing: anti-Libertarian sites (unlike MeWe, which is Libertarian and bans "linkbait"), computer science-related topics, and interactive online digital entertainment sites (preferably, the last two topics should be discussed using different profiles).
ReplyDeleteBenjamin Russell
ReplyDeleteJA!,... ich benötige eigentlich etwas, das genauso wie hier auf G+ ist.
Ich benötige etwas Vielfältigkeit!!!
Ich möchte gleichzeitig gute Fotofreunde, eigenes wachsen in der Fotografie,...
gutes, eigenes wachsen in der Kunst und deshalb interessante Künstler und Kunstbeiträge...
Ich will bestimmte Neuigkeiten, Nachrichten, informationen...
und ich diskutiere gerne!!!
Das alles habe ich hier auf G+.
Aber es gibt leider keine geeignete Alternative zu sehen, in der ich das alles habe.
Also ist es empfehlenswert, für den Foto / Kunst / Videokunst ~ Bereich dann das Flickr zu wählen.
Da es für diesen Bereich sehr ähnlich zu G+ ist...
Und man innerhalb der Kommentare auch dort mit anderen kommunizieren kann!
Und momentan bleibt keine andere Wahl, man muss sich etwas "dazu nehmen".
Openbook, Human... Es scheint noch nicht soweit!
MeWe scheint derzeit auch noch nicht geeignet...
Das Zuckerberg Imperium kommt für mich keinesfalls in Frage. Diese Datenkrake werde ich nicht unterstützen!!!
Also bleibt anscheinend momentan nur Twitter, als Zusatz einzubinden.
Leider bin ich kein Technikfreak und ich benötige eine einfache, stabile "Plattform", ohne Experimente!!
Und ich will meine Rechte an meinen Daten behalten!!!
Ich möchte kein YouTube und kein Maps als soziales Netzwerk... Ich lehne derartige Verknüpfung ab!!
Und ich habe nur kleine Technik [simples Tablet und manchmal Zugriff auf den WIN10 PC] zur Verfügung. ;)
Andi Droid Indeed; there does not seem to be a single solution at the moment.
ReplyDeleteSo far, I have combined USENET (accessible using Google Groups and various newsreaders) for detailed discussion, Dreamwidth for communities, and Openbook for hope for the future; however, at the moment, none seem ideal by themselves. USENET posts cannot be edited after submission, Dreamwidth doesn't have enough communities for the topics in which I am interested, and Openbook hasn't yet launched.
I am also investigating friendica; however, that service seems to have at least one intermittent bug of notifications of friend requests that sometimes cannot be removed.
Perhaps I might move my HubZilla account from its current node, named "Goggleplus" (which seems to be a misspelling of either "Goggles-plus" or "Googolplus"), to another better-named one, ideally named "Googolplus" (since "googol," unlike "Google," is a term for a 1 followed by 100 zeroes). Another option might simply be to delete my current Goggleplus HubZilla account and to recreate it on another node.
Benjamin Russell
ReplyDeleteJA!, tatsächlich, lieber Benjamin, es ist alles ein riesiges Dilemma!!! : (
Ich kenne es bisher noch nicht... Aber kann das Twitter nicht geeignet sein,... Für Nachrichten, Informationen, Diskussionszwecke???
Andi Droid Well, I already use Twitter, but have had a number of difficulties with that service. First off, my character-count is restricted to very short messages that don't allow me to type enough. Second, I have had problems with some other users being very judgmental: One Japanese user there banned me just because I used English instead of Japanese. I prefer to avoid Twitter except when communicating with commercial services using direct messages.
ReplyDeleteBenjamin Russell
ReplyDeleteAh!,... Dank, lieber Benjamin...
Ich denke, es ist ziemlich unschön und sollte nicht passieren, anderen Menschen die Sprache der Wahl zu verbieten!
Es tut mir sehr leid, dass du dort derartige dumme Leute getroffen hast!!
Hmmm,... nur wenig Zeichen... Das scheint nicht ausreichend für echte, anregende Kommunikation. :-/
Vielleicht muss man dann tatsächlich auch noch blogspot, als eine dritte Platform hinzunehmen!?!
Es war tatsächlich nicht mein Vorhaben, zukünftig meine Zeit auf drei Plätze zu verteilen. : (
Nun, dann scheint das Twitter also wenigstens den Teil der fehlenden Nachrichtendienste zu füllen.
Und ich konnte inzwischen sehen, einige Info ~ Community's von G+ haben auch eine Twitter Adresse. ;)
Es ist und es bleibt also ein großes Dilemma!!! : [
Dankeschön nochmals, für deine hilfreichen Informationen und viele Beste Grüße : ))
Andi Droid Well, it's rather interesting that you should characterize that particular person as being unintelligent, because that person himself actually complained in his own Twitter feed about supposedly not being "smart" enough. What I didn't understand was the reason that he was smart enough to know that he apparently wasn't very smart, but not smart enough to act in a smart manner. ;-) I myself do not consider myself to be very smart because my college computer science professor once told me, "I don't think that you're cut-out for computer science"; however, I don't use that as an excuse to ban people for not using English (otherwise, this conversation would not be transpiring in the first place).
ReplyDeleteBenjamin Russell
ReplyDeleteAh!,... Ich meine nicht "dumme" Person, wie ohne Intelligenz, lieber Benjamin.
Ich meine, "dumme" Person als eine Art Beschreibung, für Leute ohne ausreichende soziale Empathie, ohne Einfühlungsvermögen... Also eine Art des mangelhaften sozialen Miteinander!! ;))
Es gibt sehr intelligente Leute, die im sozialen Miteinander aber dennoch ziemlich "dumm" sein können.
Das dieser sich selbst als nicht "klug" bezeichnete... Es bedeutet sicher, er hatte irgendwo einen Nachteil bekommen... Also für sich selbst unvorteilhaft gehandelt.
Die Bezeichnung "dumm" beziehungsweise "klug" können verschieden eingesetzt werden.
Es hat nicht immer nur mit reiner "Intelligenz" zu tun. ;)
Hier bei uns in Deutschland gibt es viele Menschen, die sagen...
Es ist "klug", ein Egoist zu sein.
Und es ist "dumm" ein Mitgefühl zu zeigen.
Ich selbst denke, zu viel Egoismus ist falsch und ohne Mitgefühl kann eine menschliche Gesellschaft nicht friedlich existieren.
Deshalb werde ich auch oftmals für "dumm" gehalten.
Allerdings halte ich Menschen, die auch mit meiner Meinung gehen, für "klug"!! ;))
Andi Droid Ah, I see. In other words, you redefine "stupid" to mean "lacking empathy"; therefore, according to your definition, the Twitter user who banned me just for using English was "stupid" in the sense that he was "lacking empathy."
ReplyDeleteWell, while I can understand your perspective, I'm not certain that I would agree with it, because that would mean that your definition also would probably apply to Professor Drew V. McDermott, who once told me in the first 5 minutes of his first office-hour session with me, when I was unable to understand his Common Lisp code, "I don't think that you're cut-out for computer science."
The problem is that, with the exception of the sub-area of computer architecture, Professor McDermott was probably correct: I am indeed very weak at both programming and discrete mathematics, which are crucial for most areas of computer science, and the only reason that his claim fails for the sub-area of computer architecture is that it is possible to study computer architecture without using either programming or discrete mathematics.
Therefore, although Professor McDermott was technically incorrect because computer science includes computer architecture, and his claim fails for computer architecture, thus invalidating his claim in the general case, it still is valid for approximately 99% of computer science. His mistake was that he made a general, rather than specific, claim, and for his claim to be true according to logic, it must be true in every case; however, it fails for computer architecture, thus causing it to fail for the general case, which must include this specific case as well.
However, I would disagree with the implication that Professor McDermott was "stupid," even by your definition of "stupid" as "lacking empathy." It is true that his casual comment, made in September of 1990, has so far caused approximately 28 years and 2 months of complete misery for me and caused me to embark on a mad voyage into uncomfortable territory just to prove that he was wrong; however, from his perspective, he was probably just making what he considered to be a matter-of-fact observation that turned out to be only 99%, but not 100%, correct.
Professor McDermott once wrote a short procedure in Common Lisp on-the-fly in class in response to a student's suggestion. The speed at which he could write in Common Lisp was truly astonishing; he wrote that code at approximately the same speed at which most students write in their native language. If I remember correctly, he wrote that procedure in approximately 30 seconds; during my entire period in college, I never saw any other professor write code in any programming language at nearly that speed.
Therefore, I estimate that he probably has a programming IQ of approximately 200-250; by contrast, my verbal IQ (for English) is only 148, which means that his IQ in his forte is probably approximately 52-102 points higher than mine.
To my knowledge, he had the worst personality but highest programming intellect of all of my computer science professors in college. He once referred to the "Chinese Room Argument" research of another prominent AI researcher, John Searle, as "atrocious" in a videotaped international AI research conference, and is not afraid to make negative remarks regarding the academic ability of other scholars whenever he thinks the remarks apply.
However, I do not believe that Professor McDermott is "stupid," even in your sense of "lacking empathy." He probably thinks that he is just being matter-of-fact, and that because he is a tenured professor, he is entitled to criticize other scholars as he sees fit, regardless of how negative that his comments may be.
In a sense, he is a type of equal opportunity criticizer: a person who criticizes other scholars on the same basis, regardless of whether they are undergraduate students or other professors.
ReplyDeleteOne of my personal goals is to become a type of Drew V. McDermott of poetry. One day, I might encounter some other poet who might present some poem with faulty rhyme or meter to me, and I shall tell that poet: "I don't think that you're cut-out for poetry." Then that poet will spend the next 28+ years of his/her life in struggling with some type of difficult poetry just to refute my claim. Then I shall finally stop feeling that I am somehow lacking in intelligence.
Benjamin Russell
ReplyDeleteAh!,... lieber Benjamin, ich wollte eigentlich nur zum Ausdruck bringen, dass zum Beispiel die Worte "dumm" oder "klug" in ihrer Anwendung immer auch vielfältige Möglichkeiten in sich beinhalten. ;)
Wenn mir jemand sagt, ich sei "dumm"...
Dann habe ich immer die Möglichkeit, diese Aussage auf mich zu beziehen, also diese Aussage dadurch anzunehmen.
Oder ich bin mir selbst vielleicht bewusst, dass ich nicht "dumm" oder auch nicht "dumm" genug bin...
Dann lasse ich die gemachte Aussage so stehen, ohne diese anzunehmen und ohne weiter darüber nachzudenken. ;)
Oder ich nehme die gemachte Aussage an und frage den Betreffenden direkt, wie genau denn diese Aussage und dieses "dumm" gemeint ist. ;)
Insgesamt denke ich, für das eigene Leben ist es immer bekömmlich, sich nicht von den Meinungen anderer zu stark abhängig zu machen.
Ich denke, unsere Welt wäre um ein Vielfaches schöner, erträglicher und friedlicher für uns alle, wenn alle Menschen nach der "goldenen Regel" leben würden.
Immer eine schöne und glückreiche Zeit, voller Fröhlichkeit für dich und allerbeste Grüße : ))