Skip to main content

If I get on another social platform, I think it would be decentralized on the blockchain.

If I get on another social platform, I think it would be decentralized on the blockchain.
Can't be "switch off" and no privacy data issues.

Comments

  1. Why would you want to shackle your social network to such a stone-age technology that it can't even handle Terrans and Martians in a shared blockchain ???

    ReplyDelete
  2. "ON" the blockchain seems silly... let's have another ledger that grows to petabytes per day full of garbage. Using the blockchain for authentication and security seems reasonable though. Peer-To-Peer file-sharing with encryption keys shared through the blockchain, maybe. If your 'circles' shared the content then not everyone needs to be running their individual nodes 24/7. Yes, it's still the same amount of data, but not everyone needs to have it all. Maidsafe uses datachains, not blockchains.

    maidsafe.net - Providing Privacy, Security and Freedom | MaidSafe

    ReplyDelete
  3. Insert rant about blockchains and their complete uselessness.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

New comments on this blog are moderated. If you do not have a Google identity, you are welcome to post anonymously. Your comments will appear here after they have been reviewed. Comments with vulgarity will be rejected.

”go"